Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY" Results 541 - 560 of 964
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Two years later, the content industries (and some of their friends in Washington) still haven’t figured out that we’re not going to let that happen. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
In any event, following discovery, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.In her summary judgment motion, defendant contended that the joint accounts in the names of decedent and defendant are non-probate assets subject to the MPDA, and that upon decedent's death, the accounts became defendant's sole property and not part of decedent's estate. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:27 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
 The bankruptcy court granted the motion over the debtor's objection (citing In re D’Annies Restaurant, 15 B.R. 828 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: But you wouldn’t have gotten their property; isn’t that what this suit is about, you trying to take over the –the casino? [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:52 am by Daniel Richardson
  His argument is that the civil court lacked authority to attach property under the probate statutes, the attachment has no priority,  and the probate court had so ruled that way—so res judicata, y’all! [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, the court held that the motion to dismiss is granted. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:22 am by Matt Bouchard
Hanover wins both rounds 1 and 2, as its motion for summary judgment is granted in the bankruptcy court and affirmed by the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)   I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:37 am by Maya Angenot
Langevin’s declaratory motion for own [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 4:03 am by Peter Mahler
The court also supported its conclusion with an observation bottomed in property law: Furthermore, a share is the property of the shareholder, not of the corporation (Gilbert Paper Co. v Prankard, 204 App Div 83, 86 [3d Dept 1923]). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm by Larry Catá Backer
On the other hand, members of the House of Representatives answer to the people of their district, and do so often, standing for re-election on short cycles (Art. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Byrd 13-29Issue: Whether ERISA’s statutory protections and broad preemption provision protect designated beneficiaries from claims by an estate to enforce a purported waiver of those benefits incorporated into a state law divorce decree and property settlement agreement when the deceased plan participant had the opportunity to change her designated beneficiary but did not do so. [read post]