Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: J. F., A CHILD"
Results 541 - 560
of 718
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
We will post a case comment on this interesting decision shortly. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
& BEVENA F. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
It is safe to leave raw milk at room temperature.This myth appears to come from a revival in the interest in traditional diets and practices. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
Although there is some precedent in other contexts for the proposition that “a public official … owe[s] a fiduciary duty to the public to make governmental decisions in the public’s best interest,”[18] such a duty would be irrelevant to the problem at hand. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:35 am
Thomas More, 651 F.3d at 560–61 (Sutton, J., concurring). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
The issue in Turner was whether state-funded lawyers were required before a person could, at the behest of the child’s custodian, be incarcerated for contempt for failure to pay child support. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:08 pm
LICRA, 433 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2006) for an overview of the case and Yahoo! [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
In the interest of time and space, I haven’t discussed the municipal court candidates, but Smartvoter.org lists them. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:29 am
The party's dependent child(ren). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
For example, septic tank issues, rodent or insect infestation, toxic waste, mold or a past history of taboo crimes like child abuse. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:23 am
(f)? [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Ohio Revised Code Section 3109.04 (F)(1)(a-j) delineates the ‘relevant factors’ the Court must consider in making the decision of who will gain custody. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
Does 1- 1337, Case No. 3:11-cv-00147-F, *3 (Furgeson, J.) [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
As to child support, the answer is a definitive "no. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
Sohail Khattak, et. al., “Pregnancy Outcome Following Gestational Exposure to Organic Solvents,” 281 J. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
NewsomRobert J. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:16 pm
Erica Franklin, Commentary: Challenging Child Exclusion in California State Court, 26 Berkeley J. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:28 pm
For other interesting reading not related to any of the major issues feature in the news last week, why not check out Kat Watson’s post in the F word Blog asking where are the feminist lawyers? [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:00 am
(f) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
