Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF L. H." Results 541 - 560 of 2,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 9:59 am by Michael Lowe
From the Guideline, here is the complete Loss Table: (1) If the loss exceeded $6,500, increase the offense level as follows: Loss (apply the greatest) Increase in Level (A) $6,500 or less no increase (B) More than $6,500 add 2 (C) More than $15,000 add 4 (D) More than $40,000 add 6 (E) More than $95,000 add 8 (F) More than $150,000 add 10 (G) More than $250,000 add 12 (H) More than $550,000 add 14 (I) More than $1,500,000 add 16 (J) More than $3,500,000 add 18 (K) More than $9,500,000 add… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:48 am by admin
” Bill Freivogel notes one expert and one judge-related matter of note: “Youngevity Int’l v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:52 am
Because much of what Hamas does as a political organization and religious and social movement falls well outside the scope of terrorism, or even violence for that matter, one conspicuous reason it has been able to gar [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:37 am by Courtland C. Witherup
Gone are the days when a company letter and organizational chart were enough to support an L-1A manager case or just quoting the Occupational Outlook Handbook was enough to demonstrate specialty occupation status for an H-1B petition. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
In the Paoli Railroad yard litigation, plaintiffs claimed injuries and increased risk of future cancers from environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Y&H Corp., also authored by Justice Ginsburg, in which the Court held that the numerical threshold for Title VII coverage—at least 15 employees—is not a jurisdictional requirement. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Working sessions Working sessions K: Grievances Concerning Pure Academic Matters Part 2. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]