Search for: "In Re Grand Jury Investigation, Doe"
Results 541 - 560
of 792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm
The case is In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, No. 11-12268 & 11-15421 (11th Cir. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
On the other hand, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit sitting in Atlanta held yesterday in In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated March 25, 2011 that forcing a suspect to decrypt a computer or produce a decrypted version of the files on the computer is testimonial, and therefore does trigger Fifth Amendment protection. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
In In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated March 25, 2011, the Eleventh Circuit released a published opinion and reversed a district court's order finding Doe in civil contempt. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:15 pm
Id. at 1414, citing In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527 (2d Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F3d 910 (8th Cir. 1997); In re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263, (D.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:26 am
Bitting or any other engineer re-inspect the house. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
” The judge said Schuelke’s probe “differed in significant respects” from a grand jury investigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:50 pm
Love, Barack. * * * * *That runaway grand jury? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:56 pm
If even 1 of the jurors does not agree, the jury is considered "hung" and the person will not be found guilty, although they may later be re-tried. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:58 pm
Back to the grand jury courtroom. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
In In re Grand Jury Subpoena to Boucher, 2007 WL 4246473 (D. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:10 pm
Justice Department announced that a grand jury indicted Megaupload in one of the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
Federal prosecutors have a competitive advantage over local prosecutors: a Department of Justice that allows, and expects, slow and painstaking grand jury investigations. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:36 am
They probably spent the time between November 18 and Jan. 5 doing the paperwork to get approval from the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section to indict on the RICO Counts and taking the case to the grand jury. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:55 am
The conclusions of the multiple criminal investigations (and one assumes a grand jury investigation) was that Google was doing exactly what Secretary Califano suggested. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
” Meanwhile, I’ve been advised by family who still live in New York to reassure all of you New York Giants fans that the star I wear does not mean that I play for the Dallas Cowboys. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
” Sullivan involved the issue of what the jury had considered in returning an indictment, and the concurring opinion produced the quote of the year: “Even if the hoary aphorism that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich were true, such a result should still make clear that the grand jury considered what the sandwich allegedly did. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm
This does not affect the 185th or 232nd Grand Jury which have been extended for pending investigations. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am
Where the indictment is factually unsupported either on its face or in the grand jury proceedings, dismissal is appropriate. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 4:30 am
All right, Elving, hand whichever one of these fellas you like a subpoena and we’ll go on downstairs and talk in front of the grand jury. [read post]
