Search for: "In Re Transition Rule 12" Results 541 - 560 of 922
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2016, 7:58 am
Initially, that transition would unravel under the Development Plan’s guidelines, announced during the 7th Communist Party Congress and intended until 2030. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:09 am
At their swearing-in ceremony on 12 October, the duo defined the customary oath of office by swearing allegiance to the “Hong Kong Nation,” displaying a banner saying “Hong Kong is not China,” and distorted China’s proper name as the “People’s Re-Fucking of Shee-na. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
”At that point the man who, without the birther movement, would never have made the transition from reality TV celebrity to presidential candidate and eventually presidential nominee, abruptly left the stage. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:04 am by Jim Sedor
“There are political optics reasons why there’s a lot of attractiveness to make the ethics bars really strict, but in governing, you’ve got to be careful that you’re not losing on actual talent,” said Max Stier, the head of a nonprofit that is working to facilitate an orderly transition of power after the election. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
[We’re pleased to have another outstanding guest post by Stephen Carlisle, an entertainment lawyer with over 25 years experience in private practice in the State of Florida. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The SEC’s order finds that Morgan Stanley violated Rule 30(a) of Regulation S-P, also known as the “Safeguards Rule. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:19 am by Kevin Goldberg
While these are the first increases in 12 years, we won’t be waiting that long for the next changes. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:11 am by jason
For people 65 and over, the number dips to just 12 percent. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:11 am by jason
For people 65 and over, the number dips to just 12 percent. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court ruling that effectively legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Petricone: 1998, there was a period of transition, to be expected for any new tech; increasingly embracing the internet. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of Canada is not forever bound by its past rulings and has the jurisdiction to revisit a decision. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 4:24 pm
The transition in China’s form of development is currently framed in terms of “upgrading and updating” and industrial transfer. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:48 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Contracting can be so shoddy, buildings crumble months after they’re built. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
An alleged co-inventor’s testimonyregarding his contribution must be corroborated, whichcourts assess under a “rule of reason” analysis. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 3:43 am by Darius Whelan
Legal Regulation and the end of The War on Drugs - Dublin Institute of Technology, School of Law - Public Lecture Series, DublinDetails at http://www.dit.ie/llss/newsevents/newsarticles/headline,126073,en.html11-12 April 2016:BILETA Conference 2016: Future, law, education and technology - WoW, have we forgotten something? [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 3:43 am by Darius Whelan
Legal Regulation and the end of The War on Drugs - Dublin Institute of Technology, School of Law - Public Lecture Series, DublinDetails at http://www.dit.ie/llss/newsevents/newsarticles/headline,126073,en.html11-12 April 2016:BILETA Conference 2016: Future, law, education and technology - WoW, have we forgotten something? [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 3:43 am by Darius Whelan
Legal Regulation and the end of The War on Drugs - Dublin Institute of Technology, School of Law - Public Lecture Series, DublinDetails at http://www.dit.ie/llss/newsevents/newsarticles/headline,126073,en.html11-12 April 2016:BILETA Conference 2016: Future, law, education and technology - WoW, have we forgotten something? [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 8:03 am by S2KM Limited
The title of the one joint SSP/ASNP presentation in Tucson ("Structured Settlements and Special Needs Trusts") re-enforced this misconception. [read post]