Search for: "In re Richard D." Results 541 - 560 of 3,039
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
First, Judge Richard Seeborg cited and applied Rule 702, a statute, and not dicta from case law that predates the most recent statutory version of the rule. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “[t]hree moms from Montana will be at the Supreme Court Wednesday with a chance to make history on religious school choice”; “[w]hat they’re fighting over [in Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:28 am by Jillian C. York
And understandably so—as Richard Nephew, a sanctions expert and senior research scholar at Columbia University told CNN: [T]his is a tough gray area as we also have free speech protections too. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers (D), who won the state by less than 30,000 votes, has called the purge “another attempt at overriding the will of the people and stifling the democratic process. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
In 2016, Hale Devices Inc. acquired the Aiwa trade marks for the US, changed its name to Aiwa Corporation and marketed a speaker under the Aiwa brand.In 2017 a Japanese company called Towada Audio acquired Sony's AIWA trade mark portfolio and changed its name to Aiwa Co Ltd in order to re-establish the brand. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
Claymore Holdings, LLC (No. 18-0403) Janet Richards, Melvin Richards, and Amanda Culver Meals v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 2:32 pm by Francis Pileggi
Sultan, on behalf of Essendant investors, did not “come close” to meeting that formidable standard and did not show CEO Richard D. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Senators Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) asked USDA to relax current regulations, including the maximum level of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:39 am by Marty Lederman
  Those planning to run for re-election naturally will care about the effect of their vote on their electoral prospects--it'd be asking a lot to insist that any of them be indifferent to such considerations. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:05 am by SHG
I’d turn the question around: Where in the Constitution or in the history or theory of its interpretation is that principle located? [read post]