Search for: "JANES v. JANES"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Yarbrough (D.N.M.): … Plaintiff filed her complaint under the pseudonym "Jane Doe. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:04 am
Author Thewub Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Mellor) Anan Kasei Co. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:15 pm
You can see the Complaint (alleging breach of contract, defamation, disclosure of private facts, and related torts) in Jane Doe & John Doe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
Last Week in the Courts The High Court has awarded damages of just over £80,000 for fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentation against Mohamed Fahmy and The Investigative Journal Limited (TIJ) following a claim brought by journalist and editor Jane Cahane. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Plaintiff retorts that this argument "just does not make sense" because the witnesses are medical professionals—or medical students—who often use the name "Jane Doe" to refer to unidentified female patients. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:28 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Ms Pat Treacy) Insulet Corporation v Roche Diabetes Care Ltd [2021] EWHC 1907 (Pat) (9 July 2021)This was a patent infringement claim with a patent revocation counterclaim. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:10 am
Indiana University Health, Inc et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:45 am
Author Ambrosiani Licence CC BY-SA 4,0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 2080 (Pat) (1 July 2021)On 23 Oct 2021, I discussed Mr Justice Meade's judgment in Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat) (25 June 2021). [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 7:19 am
Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat) (25 June 2021)This was the second of a series of trials between the claimant patent portfolio owners and the defendant implementors in FRAND litigation. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
On the other hand, in 1997, long before Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:36 am
Jamaica Seven LLC v Marion M Douglas, Tracey Reid, John Doe, Jane Doe was heard on September 30th, 2021. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Senior Master Fontaine entered default judgement in favour of Jane Cahane, the ex-editor of The Investigative Journal (TIJ), a London-based news website that claimed to publish objective public interest long-form journalism, following Cahane’s claim that she had been misled about the sites intentions and funding. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Jane Does 1-6 v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 3:45 pm
From Jane Does 1-6 v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:35 am
Edutainment Live, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 10:31 am
Author TheBrickeninaGlory Licence CC BY-SA 3.0 Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr David Stome) Cormeton Fire Protection Ltd v Pyrocel Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 2384 (IPEC) (26 Aug 2021)These were further proceedings in a dispute between parties that had once been closely associated but had subsequently fallen out over rights to use branding that they had [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
[The unusually named case is Doe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:52 am
Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr David Stone) Lutec (UK) Ltd and others v Cascade Holdings Ltd and another (Costs) [2021] EWHC 2259 (IPEC) (13 Aug 2021)In Lutec (UK) Ltd and others v Cascade Holdings Ltd and another [2021] EWHC 1936 (IPEC) (09 July 2021), Mr David Stone found that the defendants had infringed the third claimant's registered designs. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 5:10 am
A cautionary tale, from Doe v. [read post]
