Search for: "Judicial Standards Commission Rules" Results 541 - 560 of 3,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2023, 12:14 pm by Bona Law PC
Supreme Court ruled against the Federal Trade Commission and allowed Axon Enterprise to raise certain constitutional objections to FTC processes in federal court before going through the FTC’s internal administrative proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
My focus at the New York City Bar Association in January was on how careful comparisons between reformed military commissions and the federal courts can help highlight the two systems’ similarities, expose the systems’ differences to be consistent with the rule of law, and debunk the myth of military commissions as unsettled and unfair. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:55 am by Larry Catá Backer
Such suspicion of arbitrariness is grounded on the assumption of a totalistic state judicial apparatus---that any governmental detention and prosecution outside of the state judicial system it ought to be illegitimate. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:55 pm by Steve Sady
The BOP hardly ever files § 3582(c) motions and when it does, the standard is imminent death or what we call “the death rattle rule. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:44 pm
Democracy and the rule of law at the Human Rights Council The former Commission on Human Rights adopted several landmark resolutions regarding democracy. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:22 am
If  judicially trained minds can come to diametrically opposite conclusions on the same set of facts it is obvious that expressions such as “grossly offensive” or  “menacing”  are  so  vague  that  there  is  no  manageable standard by which a person can be said to have committed an offence or not to have committed an offence. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Tim James-Matthews
The deceased’s brother sought to challenge the determination of the coronial inquest by way of judicial review proceedings. [read post]
  While the Commission reiterated that past auction results will not be re-opened (see, e.g., PJM MOPR Order I, 170 FERC ¶ 61,034 at P 89), no Commission can bind its future members, and case law indicates that the Commission retains the authority to rectify its legal error retroactively. [read post]
18 May 2012, 7:25 am by Eric Schweibenz
  ALJ Gildea noted, however, that the Commission Rules do not provide him with the authority to compel a non-party. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:25 am by Wells Bennett
 The commission once more is called to order. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 6:19 pm
Adopted 110 Replaces the Judicial Division Standards Relating to Juror Use and Management with the ABA Principles for Juries and Jury Trials, adopted February 2005. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:10 am by Michael Lowe
  See if you agree that what you’ve read is not a judicial determination of the facts surrounding these events, but instead a judge’s own argument to the Judicial Commission as to how it should rule. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am by Mark Ashton
Hamaday where we read a 25 page judicial opinion which can be summarized as “The Appellant did not understand appellate procedure or the standard of review. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Randy Milch, Sam Bieler
” But this change simply brought the commission’s concept of the reasonably designed information security program in line with the “safeguard” requirements the FTC set for the financial industry in 2003, an industry in which the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act gave the commission the authority to make cybersecurity rules. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:43 am by Simon Lester
The press release is here; a Q & A is here; the main communication from the Commission is here. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm by Robichaud
Beliefs in inadequate standards in the appointment process of judicial candidates only adds fuel to this fire which in turn has an effect on society’s confidence in the Court system as a whole. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 1:36 pm
Specific reference is made to the well known European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) 2007 definition of  racial profiling in its general policy recommendation No. 11 and its "objective and reasonable justification" standard. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:08 pm
Of course, the rule against citizen standing is what prevents anti-war activists from suing to stop members of Congress from holding commissions in the Armed Forces Reserves or from forcing the CIA to fully report its expenditures to the public. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 7:44 pm by Ilya Somin
But the magistrate in the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court receives something almost as important: funding for various judicial expenses, most notably money to help pay for court reporters, judicial secretaries, and law clerks. [read post]