Search for: "Large v. Superior Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, B292416 (Opinion filed 4/16/19). [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
In the more recent decision by the Superior Court in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm
The defendant first argued the trial court erred by denying his motion to disqualify superior court judge Thomas H. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:32 pm
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania agreed with the trial court, indicating that the worker failed to show that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy while praying, that he had a diminished expectation of privacy based upon his filing the workers compensation claim, and that the Islamic Center was open to the public and the worker prayed directly in front of a large window. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:45 pm
South Coast Air Quality Management District v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
(Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
At 11 a.m. today, the Court will hear argument in Vermont v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 34 Cal. 4th 319 (2004). [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm
Superior Court, the two decisions which would have made any earlier petition futile. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:18 pm
The second is Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:03 am
The trial court’s opinion in M.A.T. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:21 am
Superior Court, the courtheld that whether a worker is an employee for purposes of the California Wage Orders is determined by the “ABC test”. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:27 am
Hamilton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
(division des Aliments Krispy Kernels inc.) v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 8:34 pm
3M was able to achieve that result in part by offering substantial discounts to the large retailers - and the court said those discounts "served no business purpose other than to exclude NicSand's products from the market. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:24 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:24 pm
In Troester v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:28 pm
Those additions were made in front of the Superior Court judge and at her request, after Detective Sepeck had described these further efforts at corroboration by law enforcement. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
M.R. v. [read post]
