Search for: "Lilly v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 915
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 744 F.2d 213, 216 (1st Cir. 1984), more appropriate. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
Biogen v Medeva [1996]). [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:34 am
ACLU v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 420 A.2d 1305, 1320 (N.J. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:07 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 589 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:50 am
See Vas-Cath Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:34 am
See Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:50 am
Could the Court have been influenced by Congress' enactment of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, reversing the Court's 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
Take her opening in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
The court agreed stating: While the Supreme Court has characterized infringement as defined in the Hatch-Waxman Act as "highly artificial," see Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Ledbetter v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
The Texas Supreme Court reversed, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Jolly v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
" (quoting Lilly v Novopharm / Olanzapine) Starting around 2005, until the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca, Canadian courts applied the Promise Doctrine in the pharmaceutical context to invalidate patents. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 503 F. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., avoiding the Christopher v. [read post]
