Search for: "Lowe v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2015, 7:52 am
The case was remanded back to the district court to allow Montana’s political contribution limits to be tested under the new and more restrictive standard of Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 5:35 am
On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:33 am
New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
The Pirani brothers established a successful business through family owned companies owning and operating hotels in Canada and in the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:49 am
Last summer fifteen United States senators wrote an open letter to Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis to urge the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 3/1/10Cite: PrecisionIR, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:58 am
”Here is the full opinion of the court: United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 1:32 pm
”[16] The Decision in Martoma In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 8:35 am
Facts: This case (Jones v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:44 am
They also showed that her mental state has affected Mr. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:38 am
United States of America Rugby Football Union, Ltd., --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 3553885 (D. [read post]
