Search for: "MARCUS v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
United States. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:03 pm
United States, 553U. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
In a second case decided Thursday, DePierre v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:30 pm
Harlem Pride Day 2011 Saturday, June 25th Marcus Garvey Park 124th Street & 5th Avenue Noon to 6 p.m. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:17 am
In Sykes v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:03 am
Marcus v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:23 am
Divorce lawyer Marcus Dearle is a partner in the venerable law firm Withers, a firm that began in the United Kingdom in 1896 and now has eight offices throughout Europe, Asia, the United States and the Caribbean. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:00 am
For more on non-delegable duties of a board, please view our previous posts, “Advisory Board v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:28 pm
In Stoloff v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:19 am
They were: Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276 (set aside on appeal) and DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB) (granted for seven days for anti-tipping-off reasons). [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Marcus W. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:00 am
As CA v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:56 am
We hold that the state court’s rejection of Ferrell’s ineffective-assistance claims was an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm
The public is, as usual, left in a state of misinformed confusion. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
Is this an easy fight for Louboutin or does Yves Saint Laurent have it in the (Neiman Marcus) bag? [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 10:09 am
In Berry v. [read post]
