Search for: "MARK A. MOORE"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2015, 4:54 pm
” We look forward to some change, like a vacation, as a welcome break in routine, or like a graduation as a mark that we have completed one phase of life and are about to embark on another. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
A high degree of originality in a mark will likely create a strong, distinct mark that will be given broad protection by the courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
Brown’s Position The township officer lacked statutory authority to stop any driver on an interstate highway for a marked lane violation. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:48 am
Albeit this does not affect the use or 'expression' in the mark, but mainly the commercial aspects surrounding the mark.Peter never was a man of consistencyWhat makes the decision in Re Simon Shiao Tam interesting are the remarks made by Justice Moore, although not dissenting, after the majority's decision to reject the mark (after which the Court of Appeals issued an Order for an en banc hearing to decide the issue). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:10 pm
Sabina Catholic Church on Chicago’s south side had asked for a permit to hold a block party mark the end of the movie’s filming. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
See "Moore" Burger, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:19 pm
Having read about the trademark tiff in news reports, Shumlin wrote a letter (PDF) to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg urging him to leave Designbook alone. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 11:00 pm
» Related StoriesThis Firm Marked Up Reviewer Billings Over 500 Percent and that’s Not the Worst Part: eDiscovery TrendsFor Better Document Review, You Need to Approach a ZEN State: eDiscovery Best PracticesJudge Peck Wades Back into the TAR Pits with ‘Da Silva Moore Revisited’: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
With advances in computer technology making genetic testing exponentially cheaper and more detailed as times passes (see Moore’s law), more and more genetic variability in the efficacy of prescription drugs is bound to be discovered. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies There was a Statement in Open Court in the case of Moore v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:16 am
Sentencing for Perkins is scheduled for July 30, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. before United States District Judge Mark H. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
Maybe our motto here at DDLaw should be “we read law review articles so you don’t have to. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
However, an examination of the factual circumstances surrounding our decision in Koskovich reveals marked differences from the case here. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:55 pm
And finally, Moore notes that the “disparagement” provision permits registration of marks that refer to a particular group in a positive manner, but does not permit registration of marks that do so in a negative manner. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:02 am
Moore's inclusion of "additional views" in the CAFC's original opinion, concerning the constitutionality of Section 2(a), in which she urged that the court re-visit the CCPA's 1981 decision in In re McGinley in view of the subsequent evolution of First Amendment jurisprudence.The court's Order requests that the parties file new briefs addressing the following question: "Does the bar on registration of disparaging marks in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 10:19 am
Question presented: Does the bar on registration of disparaging marks in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:45 am
But Judge Kimberly Moore also wrote a separate opinion, in which she argued in favor of overturning the Federal Circuit precedent on which the panel relied. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:10 am
Judge Kimberly Moore penned a lengthy “additional views” opinion nearly twice as long as the opinion affirming the rejection. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 12:35 pm
The final words of Judge Moore's concurring remarks, in which the limitation on "may disparage" is questioned onconstitutional grounds:We have yet to be presented with any substantial government interests that would justify the PTO’s refusal to register disparaging marks. [read post]
