Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 6:04 am
” “A final rule of law that crops up repeatedly in business divorce cases: ‘One who has served as attorney for a corporation may not represent an individual shareholder in a case in which his interests are adverse to other shareholders’ (Matter of Greenberg, 206 AD2d 963 [4th Dept 1994]). [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 3:30 am
To demonstrate judicial bias or prejudice, an appellant must show more than the fact that the trial court ruled against him correctly or incorrectly, on a particular matter. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:23 pm
” Among the proposals Cook outlined are rules that would: reinforce the supervisory obligations of brokerage firms with respect to the continued employment of brokers with disciplinary records; require heightened supervision by those firms of individuals with a disciplinary case pending on appeal; grant adjudicators greater discretion to consider more severe sanctions when an individual’s history reveals repeated misconduct; enable hearing panels to limit the activities firms… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 11:45 am
Nothing in the seven figures … or six figures, for that matter. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:39 am
“The one-share rule is easy,” he said. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 8:08 am
“The one-share rule is easy,” he said. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:00 am
The proposal also explores alternative approaches to addressing this matter, including the coordinated review program proposed by the North American Securities Administrators Association.What's NextThe Commission will seek public comment on the proposed rules for 60 days. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
Hohman (Vt. 1980) (overruled by a later case but only as to unrelated matters), calls for disqualification in such situations, reasoning that "The awesome power to prosecute ought never to be manipulated for personal or political profit. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:31 am
In contrast to the legal effect of an individual merely submitting a “request for reconsideration,” assume that the administrative body actually agrees to reconsider the matter and thereafter issues a new determination. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 1:24 pm
” Shortly after news of this motion for sanctions and disqualification came to pub light, the story developed: “Atty Accused Of Shaking Butt At Adversary Replaced” — “The petrochemical company, a joint venture between Chevron Corp. and Phillips 66… is now represented by Norton Rose Fullbright. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
SEC and FINRA rulings decided before plaintiff entered into the consent order held that a three-year suspension by a state authority would result in a statutory disqualification and a bar from the securities industry. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:46 am
Hopefully, these courts will expedite these rulings to allow the matter to reach the Supreme Court for a final and definitive ruling. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:38 am
Please check your local rules and read the section. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am
First, Spath knowingly concealed facts that called his impartiality into question; second, he angled for a position in the Justice Department when it had a substantial interest in the case before him; third, he traded on the fact that he was the judge in Al-Nashiri’s case for his own personal gain; and fourth, he allowed his personal financial interests to influence how he handled the matter. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
The Wang two-prong test is the majority rule; both prongs must be satisfied. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:14 am
” “In its April disqualification bid, GlassBridge said Fox Rothschild represented it ‘before and during the time period at-issue in this litigation on substantially related matters,’ including the company’s directors and officers liability insurance policy. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
The ruling is important for two reasons. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 10:00 am
For the prosecution, Mark Miller argues that Judge Spath has the authority, under Rule 703 of the Rules for Military Commissions, to issue such a warrant. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
Because the disqualification grounds of Wis. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am
" Further, said the court, a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) "is properly granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes the plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law. [read post]
