Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION" Results 541 - 560 of 1,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that the Section 2(a) bar on registering immoral or scandalous marks is an unconstitutional restriction of free speech. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
Feb. 26, 2013) (If “an indemnitor has notice of the claim against it, ‘the general rule is that the indemnitor will be bound by any reasonable good faith settlement the indemnitee might thereafter make. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
Feb. 26, 2013) (If “an indemnitor has notice of the claim against it, ‘the general rule is that the indemnitor will be bound by any reasonable good faith settlement the indemnitee might thereafter make. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:38 am by Francis Pileggi
Applicable Law Rule 1.9(a) of the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct provides that a lawyer who has:  (i) formally represented a client in a matter; (ii) shall not thereafter represent a new client in the same or a substantially related matter; (iii) in which that new client’s interests are materially adverse to the interests of the former client; (iv) unless the former client gives informed consent in writing. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:59 am by Brian E. Barreira
Since the MassHealth disqualification period would begin to run upon the original transfer, any later exercise of the SPA should not cause any additional period of MassHealth disqualification. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm by familoo
There are certain matters which mean the applicant has to be referred to a tribunal. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:45 am by John Floyd
That was an insignificant matter from DA Reyna’s political perspective. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:01 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Such preliminary suspension or temporary order shall remain in effect pending a final agency decision on the matter. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Turning to the matter at hand, Spath laid out for the record the series of events that led to the current situation. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Nicholas Kehr
Although personal and business relationships, related party transactions, and other matters suggested by commenters are not specified either as bright-line disqualifications or explicit factors that must be considered in evaluating a director’s independence, the Commission believes that compliance with NYSE’s rules and the provision noted above would demand consideration of such factors with respect to compensation committee members, as well as to all… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Spiro Hristopoulos
Although personal and business relationships, related party transactions, and other matters suggested by commenters are not specified either as bright-line disqualifications or explicit factors that must be considered in evaluating a director’s independence, the Commission believes that compliance with NYSE’s rules and the provision noted above would demand consideration of such factors with respect to compensation committee members, as well as to all… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Daniel Hamilton
Although personal and business relationships, related party transactions, and other matters suggested by commenters are not specified either as bright-line disqualifications or explicit factors that must be considered in evaluating a director’s independence, the Commission believes that compliance with NYSE’s rules and the provision noted above would demand consideration of such factors with respect to compensation committee members, as well as to all… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
"In effect (although amici do not say so), the amici (and ECUSA/ECSC) are arguing that Bishop Lawrence and his attorneys waived any right to challenge Justice Hearn for bias because they waited until after she had ruled in the main case, when they could have stated many of their same grounds for disqualification two years earlier, before the oral arguments. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 3:07 pm
"In effect (although amici do not say so), the amici (and ECUSA/ECSC) are arguing that Bishop Lawrence and his attorneys waived any right to challenge Justice Hearn for bias because they waited until after she had ruled in the main case, when they could have stated many of their same grounds for disqualification two years earlier, before the oral arguments. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Harry Graver
Circuit seeking the disqualification of the active-duty military members of the CMCR hearing his appeal. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
For other positions that are not covered by Article VI, including the secretary of the Senate and clerk of the House and their staff, Congress had to create oaths by statute based on the Rules of Proceeding Clause or other enumerated powers. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm by Dan
“No matter what the evidence was against him, he had the right to have an impartial judge. [read post]