Search for: "MONEY v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 22,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 4:43 am
In determining whether a statute is procedural or substantive, the other state’s classification of its statute “is instructive and should not be ignored,” but “New York is not bound by, and principles of comity do not prompt [a New York court] to adopt” the other state’s classification (Tanges v Heidelberg N. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
Beall v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:36 am
Randy Barnett argues in the Wall Street Journal that Obamacare goes to far in threatening to withhold money from the states. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
To do so, the court employed the three-part test developed by the United States Supreme Court in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:23 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Friday blocked enforcement [order, PDF] of a Montana Supreme Court ruling, which upheld a state law [JURIST report] limiting the amount of money corporations can spend on campaigns, until it can consider an appeal from the corporations challenging the law. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:20 am
Here is the complaint in Northern Arapaho Tribe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm
Concerns about the corrosive influence of money are even greater in an Article V convention. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:42 am
In State of Nevada v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:28 am
Supreme Court ruling in Olmstead v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 4:23 pm
It's technically "income" to you even if you don't get the money. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:30 am
Part V examines the current state of Gift Clause jurisprudence in Arizona. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 10-cv-4071, U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:31 pm
In New Jersey v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
In the Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 8:09 pm
Andy Biggs, one of the most conservativein Congress – staunchly oppose calling an Article V convention, proponents would only have to pick up a handful of naïveDemocrats to open up the Constitution to moneyed special interest groups’ wildest fantasies. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
