Search for: "Manning et al v. Manning et al" Results 541 - 560 of 1,034
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
If Einstein, Darwin, Kelvin et al. can misfire, who is to say that a law professor is perfect? [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Al-Nashiri, not Bradley Manning’s trial. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.Issue: Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
” Screening Justice—The Cinema of Law: Significant Films of Law, Order and Social Justice 77 (Strickland et al., eds. 2006). [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:30 pm
Daily et al. reflex, (1997), 115 Man.R. (2d) 27. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:43 pm by Schachtman
Offense to that man by whom the WOE cometh! [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:28 am by Ivan Cohen
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 15 in Association of Molecular Pathology et al. v Myriad, concerning whether human genes are patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Gordon Firemark
Conrad Murray was hired to care for MJ and make sure he was present and alert for preparations MJ died after Murray administered lethal dose of anesthetic propofol (which was intended to help MJ sleep) Civil Suit (Katherine Jackson et al v. [read post]