Search for: "Mark Gordon"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
Consequently, by using the mark STYRIAGRA, the applicant would take unfair advantage of the reputation of the earlier mark VIAGRA. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 5:22 am
Nor does the reputation of ia the Godfather films change the association of the contested mark. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Thorsten Bausch Have a great weekend, everyone More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post Just to mark the occasion… appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:29 am
Cheryl BeiseSubstantial evidence supported the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that the mark “AQUAPEL” and design for leather and imitation leather hides, furniture covers, and various home goods was confusingly similar to the mark “AQUAPEL,” registered in standard characters, for different types of home goods, the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
UK law provides specifically that these injunctions should be available where a website is infringing copyright, but has no equivalent for trade marks. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
The best way to become acquainted with the Danish standard of morality is to have a closer look at the marks that have been refused and the marks that have been accepted. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 12:30 am
then it is worth it,” stated Clive Howard, Senior Principal Lawyer of Employment at Slater and Gordon (UK) LLP and leading expert in U.K. employment law. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
As the story goes, it was June 19, 1865, when Union Major General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, with troops under his command. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 9:37 am
Earlier Frech 3D mark Contested figurative EUTM no. 9849191 Before the Cancellation Division, the owner of the contested mark requested Glaxo to demonstrate genuine use of its earlier mark. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:02 am
The opponent alleged that the use of the later DAYADAY mark would be detrimental to, and take unfair advantage of, the (alleged) exceptionally high reputation of its mark. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
Art. 8(5) EUTMR, whereby the owner of a mark with a reputation can prevent the registration of a mark the use of which would take unfair advantage of the reputation, states that such use must be “without due cause”. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm
In 1776 he served as a delegate to the state constitutional convention, where he made a mark as a thoughtful and devoted public servant. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:07 am
Gordon (Columbia Law School) and Curtis J. [read post]
31 May 2018, 6:53 am
Among this material were product shots, as well as a short computer-animated film that entertainingly explains how to attach a saddle bag and prominently displays the plaintiff’s mark. [read post]
29 May 2018, 10:47 am
Hui Zhang, Mengling Liu and James Yang On March 28, 2018, the Beijing High Court issued its decision for Iwncomm v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:53 am
Section 10(1) TMA trade mark infringement All parties were agreed that the issue in contention was whether ESL’s SU LETS mark is identical to SUL’s SULETS mark. [read post]
25 May 2018, 8:55 am
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post Reputation of a mark and assessment of the likelihood of… [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:30 pm
Court of Appeals in San Francisco, the district court properly found that Ketab’s common law marks were not protectable because they were generic and that its registered mark was not infringed by any of the defendants. [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:00 am
Maybe the brand owner could try again to get his mark registered by showing acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 pm
The French State and the GIE Atout France (the French national tourism organization) intervened in the court proceedings between the two companies asking initially that all the marks and the domain name be transferred to the French State and subsequently that the marks be annulled or surrendered. [read post]
