Search for: "Mark J. Brown" Results 541 - 560 of 838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
Legal protection of software : patents and trade-marks Christopher C. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:11 am by Dan Tokaji
Link, Martha Kropf, Mark Alexander Hirsch, Flora M. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc., 19 F.Supp.2d 592 (S.D.W.Va. 1998) Video Games (Violent Behavior) Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Brown and Clarksburg Nursing Home & Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:26 am by Matt Homann
Best:  Passion Nicole Black: Game Set & Match Mark Britton:  Back to the Future Toby Brown:  Making Alternative Fee Agreements Work Ruth Carter:  Flash Mob Law Tara Cheever:  Keeping Support Personal in a Mobile World Jason E. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Engerrand, Brown Sims, PC, Houston, TX. 2:15 p.m. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  In the circumstances, we award him full marks for this answer. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am by Sam Morris, Olswang LLP
On 5 June 2009, Foskett J held that all ten claims could proceed to trial. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
A British Foreign and Commonwealth Office podcast at this link marks International Human Rights Day, with an edition on social media and free expression. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]