Search for: "Mark Lemley" Results 541 - 560 of 1,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
  (Ken Adamo from Jones Day did the usual very good patent law update while haranguing the audience).The sessions I was really looking forward to tomorrow were Stanford law pro Mark Lemley's presentation on his preliminary findings from a extensive survey on patent litigation data (the graphs on the handout are really, really good) and Jones Day's Hilda Galvan's presentation on the care and feeding of joint defense agreements, but I've had… [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:44 am by Michael M. O'Hear
  The contents include: Mark Lemley’s Nies Lecture, “Can the Patent Office Be Fixed? [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm by Amanda Pustilnik
If you want to get a jump on the topic, I recommend two excellent blogs and an eJournal: Law & Biosciences, written and curated by Hank Greely, Mark Lemley, and Nita Farahany; Neuroethics & Law, by Adam Kolber, and the SSRN Law & Neuroscience eJournal, co-edited by Oliver Goodenough and me. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:59 am by Erin-Michael Gill
There are other academics who are more popular for their research – Mark Lemley at Stanford obviously - but in terms of putting out careful, original research that has resonated and impacted the practical development and management of IP, these researchers stand out. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
  Interestingly, the ITC order follows a recentNYTimes editorial, by Professors Mark Lemley and Colleen Chien who argued for delay in exclusion orders in order to serve the public interest. [read post]
31 May 2008, 3:07 am
Like when numbers for patent grant rate were, um, evolving, as when Mark Lemley went from rational ignorance to (not) rubber stamping. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Our first issue was just posted on Westlaw (it took two months to do this, because it was the first issue, but they tell us that future articles will be posted much more quickly); it contains articles by top scholars such as Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), and Christopher Yoo (Virginia), and many more. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:19 am
I was recently pleased to find that my notions about trade secrets were supported as part of a much wider-ranging article by the distinguished IP scholar Mark Lemley, in his most interesting article, "The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights", Stanford Law Review, vol. 61, Nov. 2008.See also Examining the examiners of patent examination [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:12 am
"Google, which currently has 24 patent cases pending, didn't settle any patent challenges last year, after resolving cases in each of the previous four years, according to federal court dockets.One recalls that Mark Lemley, who otherwise talks about the rise in patent litigation, is part of the law firm that filed a declaratory judgment against AP over the Obama Hope poster. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:40 am
" [Heald has a J.D. from the University of Chicago, but must have picked up the hyperbolic tendencies elsewhere.]And, if you guessed Mark Lemley will be there, you would be right! [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:53 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We have a set of great speakers coming that include Mark Lemley (Stanford) and Peter Menell (Berkeley). [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:02 am by R. David Donoghue
 As usual, the Institute will hit all of the major IP current issues including: The state of the world post-Alice; A panel moderated by Mark Lemley on troll issues; and Numerous PTAB-related topics. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:31 pm by Rantanen
Chief Judge Rader will give the keynote address—other panelists include Judge Marilyn Huff, Judge Janis Sammartino, and Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo (Southern District of California), as well as Professors Colleen Chien, Mark Lemley, Robert Merges, Shine Tu, and John Whealan, and distinguished local attorneys. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Mark Lemley wrote in the Stanford Law Review that Gary Boone invented the integrated circuit, and no one at Stanford checked the statement for accuracy. [read post]