Search for: "Marks v. USA" Results 541 - 560 of 1,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
More from our authors: Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:58 am by Robert B. Barnett
More from our authors: Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 7:08 am by Thomas K. Lauletta
More from our authors: Special Protection of Trade Marks with a Reputation under European Union Law by Michal Bohaczewski€ 136 [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the instant matter does not involve common-law indemnification, in which “a contract to reimburse or indemnify is implied by law” (McDermott v City of New York, 50 NY2d at 217 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Sometimes patent holders don't want to license, and, under US law, patent holders do not have to license.Sadly, Rizzo really misses the mark in his textAs we noted in our Google-Nest deal analysis, there is certainly the possibility – even given the above patent issues Nest has uncovered – that Honeywell will win the patent lawsuit. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 8:29 am
Joan Biskupic, USA Today's Supreme Court correspondent has, "Executions likely on hold until high-court ruling. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 12:32 am by Aneesa Bodiat
In Maine, USA, the interpretation of a state law involving overtime pay revolved around the use of the Oxford comma. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
  At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Steven Schwinn discusses the grant in Harris v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
 | When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark |  BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle |  Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 10:13 pm
Relying on the previous ninth circuit decision of Barcamerica Int’l USA Trust v Tyfield Importers, Inc., 289 F.3d 589 (9th Cir. 2002), the court rejected all attempts by TFN in support of its claim that adequate quality control was in place. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:32 pm
Rugaber reports here; and Mark H. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 2:19 pm by New York Civil Law
The Appellate Division, First Department recently worked through interesting issues in a product liability case -- Rossi v Doka USA, Ltd. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
* Trade mark troubles in the Galápagos islandsWe are accustomed to view a brand in positive terms, as a valuable asset of its owner. [read post]