Search for: "Matter of Appeal From Civil Penalty" Results 541 - 560 of 2,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 11:30 am by Courtney Minick
This ruling allows the federal court subject matter jurisdiction over the defendants’ claim–it does not reach the merits. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:30 am by Courtney Minick
The Court held that federal courts have jurisdiction to hear the defendant’s complaint in a Section 1983 civil rights action. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 3:00 am by Sherica Celine
California: The California Supreme Court concludes that the state legislature intended to exempt public employers from certain state Labor Code provisions and that public entity employers are not subject to Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) suits for civil penalties. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:44 am by William McGrath
This means that a defendant could, as a result of the admission in the SEC settlement, be precluded from challenging liability in the private civil litigation. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court noted that in Gomez v Stout, 13 NY3d 182, the Court of Appeals interpreted Civil Service Law §7 (2) to "require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, with the governmental department's chain of command…. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm by Curran Tomko Tarski LLP
Noncompliance with these and other HIPAA requirements subjects covered entities and business associates to civil penalties, criminal prosecution, civil damage awards under lawsuits brought by state attorneys general, and other legal remedies. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm by Andrew Delaney
 Third and finally, we have an appeal from a parental-rights-and-responsibilities (PRR) and parent-child-contact (PCC) order. [read post]
26 May 2008, 3:09 pm
  First, though, full disclosure: I was counsel for the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association in the appeal. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:53 pm
JASON ETTENGER â€" CASE NO. 2008-L-054 (PDF or here) Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 08 MS 000039. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:51 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  In addition to a 30-day freeze on all regulatory action, CFPB hiring, and payments from the civil penalty fund, Mr. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Smith argues that the hearing examiner could reasonably have concluded that since section 143.1015(k) requires the presence of the department head at civil service appeal proceedings in Houston, the same rule should apply in other cities. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:07 am by Steve Hall
"Debate on death penalty revives," is a lengthy article by Alan Gustafson from the Sunday edition of the Salem Statesman Journal, in Oregon. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:50 pm by Morgan Forsey and Ian Michalak
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeal reasoned that the arbitration and confidentiality agreements should be construed together pursuant to California Civil Code section 1642. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:03 pm by Aaron Mackey
This is both wrong as a matter of First Amendment law, and dangerous. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:00 am
On appeal, Combs contended that (1) the court's failure to apply the "administrative/production worker dichotomy" pertaining to the administrative exemption from overtime compensation, which was announced in Bell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
His conduct also did not prevent them from attending class, nor did it involve any physical assault. [read post]