Search for: "Matter of Russell v Russell"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2016, 9:14 am
That was the main question posed by Zubik v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:06 am
Zubik v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:07 pm
Four Justices dissented in Burwell v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 8:46 am
Chief Justice Roberts announces the Court’s per curiam decision in Zubik v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:59 pm
Heffernan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 12:14 pm
Cases like the The Arches Condominium v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
Or, is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination of whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
The petition of the day is: ParkerVision, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
For a good brief discussion of how to write a convincing cert petition, check out SCOTUS blog's Kevin Russell here. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia Daniel Russel clarified that the ASEAN summit that President Obama will host this month is “not anti-China. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
KG v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:16 am
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Abbott, Diane Kindermann, Glen Hansen, Brian Russell and Dan Cucchi Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2015 Annual CEQA update. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Enviratrands, Inc. and Russell F. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:53 am
It does not matter that this perception was incorrect. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Russell, 218 S.E.2d 54, 62–63 (Ga. 1975); O’Brien v. [read post]
