Search for: "Mays v. City of LA" Results 541 - 560 of 1,046
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 9:45 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Indeed, given the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 9:45 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Indeed, given the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Augustus v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:02 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Exploring PST’s architectural initiative is a reminder of the powerful effect of innovative architecture on a city. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
May 2020 be even better than last year! [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 9:17 am by Rick Hills
In other words, the pro-federalism rhetoric of the Cato Institute in Comstock may come back to haunt them in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:56 am by Jason Poblete
La Bodeguita del Medio may be an icon, but it has little jurisprudential value. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:33 pm by Monica Williamson
Quileute Tribe Part Time Prosecutor, La Push, WA. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Jacobs filed a separate dissenting opinion (Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:29 am by Sheppard Mullin
Avoiding discrimination allegations without creating reverse discrimination liability after Dukes v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:01 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Avoiding discrimination allegations without creating reverse discrimination liability after Dukes v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
So some would-be plaintiffs may have their not-yet-barred claim nixed by the SOL-shortening and may not have viable alternative theories of legal liability to avoid the harsh impact of the new rule, e.g., in a defamation case, which involves a 1-year limit. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm by Giles Peaker
But then there are two previous judgments on this issue, which the Upper Tribunal then turns to: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nelson and Fife Council (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our report here) and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Glasgow City Council and IB (2017) CSIH 35 (our report here). [read post]