Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
Microsoft Corp. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 9:39 pm
The Internet Archive has said it will not appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm
United States, 690 F.2d 1368 (Fed. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
Katz Technology Licensing LP (“Katz”) appeals from final judgments entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in a group of consolidated cases. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:41 pm
File for harassment (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Decisions Federal Circuit holds-line on patent misuse defense: Princo Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
” Of particular concern to Apple in this latter regard is the fact that some of the evidence obtained by the Registrar came from the solicitors acting for Microsoft Corporation in Australia, in circumstances where Microsoft Corporation has opposed Apple’s corresponding application for the registration of APP STORE as a trade mark in the United States of America. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 2:48 pm
United States, they were sent on a fact-finding trip on a fishery boat in Glacier Bay. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:21 am
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
— United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union Brief for AARP and the Public Patent Foundation Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party Brief for the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Brief for the United States of America Brief for Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:27 pm
’” If the acts involving the statute’s focus occur in the United States, then the statute applies. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am
” ACSblog also covers a speech by Senator Sherrod Brown at Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law in which the Senator criticized the Court’s January decision in Citizens United. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 9:35 am
More specifically, the patent discloses and claims a variety of embodiments of a method and associated apparatus for programmatically substituting synonyms into text [...]...US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in BilskiOn Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:24 am
Microsoft Corp., 2008-1091 10 399 F.3d 1325 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh reports that one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
