Search for: "NICHOLAS v. NICHOLAS" Results 541 - 560 of 2,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
Nicholas Caddick QC (sitting as a deputy High Court judge) had already refused the same application by Trump International on 17 December 2018. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:33 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Double jeopardy — Mistrial Nicholas Perkins, appellant, was indicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County on several charges. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
Nicholas Jewell is a well-credentialed statistician at the University of California. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Content warning: This post contains content that may be upsetting for some readers. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by SHG
Does the Constitution say what its “plain meaning” appears to say to the eyes of non-lawyers, or does Marbury v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hilton, Marie-France Bich, Nicholas Kasirer et Étienne ParentDate : 1er mars 2019 ACTION COLLECTIVE (RECOURS COLLECTIF) — jugement au fond et mesures d’exécution — fumeurs — recours contre les compagnies de tabac — risques et dangers de la cigarette — dépendance à la nicotine — maladie — responsabilité extracontractuelle — préjudice à autrui — obligation de renseignement… [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
District court judge Nicholas Garaufis dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice in May 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Nicholas Chan covers the opinion for Jurist. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 9:48 pm by Patent Docs
., and Nicholas Mitrokostas of Goodwin Procter, LLP will help patent owners and their counsel navigate both patent prosecution and litigation issues related to patent term by drawing on insights from three recent Federal Circuit decisions: Novartis AG v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm by Joe Mullin
Patent Office has allowed two inventors, Nicholas Hall and Steven Eakin, to do. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:35 am
It was noted that Huawei v ZTE featured two Chinese companies (thus cutting across the stereotype of western innovators and Chinese copiers). [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]