Search for: "People v Peer"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
” He and 2 peers created an Instagram account “upperperkiscool” for the purported purpose of making fun of their classmates. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:01 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:51 am
” Sexual Predation * State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
We have the highest firm rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the prestigious peer review firm and have been named nine times as “NJ Super Lawyers®” in a survey of personal injury attorneys. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
[cite to Bland v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
His November 16, 2016 final order in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 5:12 am
The opening paragraph of Judge Eugene Pigott’s opinion in People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 6:21 pm
That begins in my opinion by having other people around you, and not just architects. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:56 pm
When the attributable risk is 95%, as it would be for people with light smoking habits and lung cancer, treating the existence of the prior risk as evidence of specific causation seems perfectly reasonable. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:07 am
Crossfit, Inc. v. [read post]
The Court after Scalia: We need a new Justice like Scalia to help end the abortion-distortion effect
15 Sep 2016, 8:06 am
Conservative advocates on the Court are also needed to persuade peers because members change sides, as Chief Justice Warren Burger did in Thornburgh v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
Part of the reason is that it is a peer review process. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:05 am
Part of the reason is that it is a peer review process. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am
In 2008’s Doe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:30 am
More law firms are now hiring people who focus on the business of the practice. [read post]
