Search for: "People v. Gay" Results 541 - 560 of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am by Mark Ashton
 As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 9:03 am by Mark Ashton
Law is developed from the cases or controversies involving real people with existing legal issues. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 3:10 am by SHG
If accepted, can this argument be used to discriminate against black people, women, gay people and transgender people? [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
Deletion did not lessen their reach or impact. [71-73] Situation of the Claimants  4)  Both of the Claimants had a public profile as gay men and gay rights activists. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:45 am by Frank Cranmer
The ET had concluded that no distinction could be drawn between the reasons that informed each of the actions in issue: “the entire proceedings … were motivated by a concern … that, by reason of her posts, [the claimant] would be perceived as holding unacceptable views in relation to gay and trans people” [ET, para 63]. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
The Supreme Court's decision in the Stolen Valor Act case, United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
” [22] On January 17, 2014, during an interview with the british interviewer Andrew Marr, Vladimir Putin said that the law “does not discriminate against gay people” [23]. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:00 am by Marsha Tesar
For those planning for their estates, the important decision was rendered in US v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Katz, The Role of Public Reason in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Mark Creech of the Christian Action League called the lawsuit "an effort by gay activism to run people of faith completely out of the public sector. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
"For whatever reason, they could not bring themselves to do what they were about to tell the American people that they had to do" seven years later in the landmark Brown v. [read post]