Search for: "People v. Graves" Results 541 - 560 of 1,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am by Jani Ihalainen
For anyone wanting to know more, please refer to the full decision.By way of a primer, the case of Australia v Indonesia and others concerned WTO proceedings with regards to the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011, which set certain rules on the packaging of tobacco products. [read post]
19 May 2018, 10:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"A Farmer's Branch police officer who'd never hypnotized anyone before failed to follow a number of mandatory requirements under Texas Court of Criminal Appeals jurisprudence in Zani v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
PARISIAN TRANSCRIPTS 2.0 We had a number of people send us material after our first post with out list of deposition transcripts (and various other items) concerning the testimony of the extremely active plaintiffs’ side expert, Dr. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
The most recent military government took power in 1976; it perpetrated many human rights violations, including killing about 30,000 people. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
If you want to really shred precedent, why not start with Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Ibanez
The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco relied on the 2006 California Supreme Court ruling of People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:28 am by Amy Howe
Jacobs considers what the Court’s ruling last month in Scialabba v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by Ted Folkman
In post-9/11 decisions, the Sixth Circuit and , in Rusmfeld v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:59 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
") I hope that if you think that, you also agree — and many don't — with what Justice Scalia said at oral argument in Salazar v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Yesterday, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued a decision in the matter of PA Liquor Control Board v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:03 am
"Earlier coverage of the case is here; more at the ScotusWiki page for Wood v. [read post]