Search for: "People v. Kent"
Results 541 - 560
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am
The inspirational trigger is me cooking meatballs in red wine and tomato sauce whilst listening to an argument on Radio 4’s ‘PM’ programme about planning permission v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:21 pm
On Monday, June 28, 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
Kohler lacked capacity when she executed her advanced directives (Matter of Goldfein v Kohler, 221 AD3d 500 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
See Weinberg v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
And… so to… Lawyer and journalist David Allen Green, on his Jack of Kent blog, picks up on the current mood with an interesting post: Thoughts on the present discontents. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 1:09 am
Schwartz quotes our friend Kent Scheidegger on what will happen if Baird gets to rule and says Willingham was innocent. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
See for example, R. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
We also discuss implications for informed decision-making by the Marshallese and local atoll governments and their people on issues pertaining to island resettlement. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
"People like them because they're natural," Nesbitt said. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Young Bickel served when Brown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 11:44 am
Young Bickel served when Brown v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am
We do not think that a White House meeting is an “official act” under McDonnell v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:15 pm
For example, Professor Adam Benforado’s new paper explores how spatial situations affect the law-related behavior and thinking of various participants in criminal cases, while another of his recent articles argues that the context of the videotape evidence at issue in Scott v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]
