Search for: "People v. Lincoln"
Results 541 - 560
of 635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Fingers crossed.But while we await developments in the Land of Lincoln, it's time to head back to the Lone Star State where the Court of Criminal Appeals, to the likely-surprise of nobody, issued its opinion this morning in State ex rel Lykos v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:01 pm
People who immerse themselves in the Constitution and its traditions often bring the concepts of that tradition to bear in their other moral and political judgments. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:53 am
Tingy and Talbot v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
v=ngxZVmtKCCo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
That said, even if there is a discernible pattern in how people have appealed to what we might call fixity, I think it is crucial to recognize that changes to the idea of fixity have changed how these arguments operate. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 1:19 pm
In the case of Huerta v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
He conceded, however, that in the case of a chancel screen of some intrinsic interest in itself, the act of removing it and re-erecting it elsewhere has some of the characteristics of removing a chattel to another location; and that this made it appropriate to consider, as what he termed “a subsidiary issue”, the extent to which the screen is “part of the heritage and history not only of the church, but also of all the people, present and [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Coordinators have assisted over 300 families this year, and have a presence with Title V, P & A, CHIP, the Child Find Policy and Practice Committee, the Governor's Chronic Illness Task Force and the Family Resource Connection (devoted to early childhood issues)! [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am
Happy people just don’t shoot their husbands. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm
Back when I was a summer associate at White & Case, we used to talk about SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Lincoln insisted that the union army abide by them in a civil war, too.) [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Secret Advantages of Judge Taylor's Opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
In my previous posts (here and here), I drew attention to the frequently neglected fact that there are, in effect, three Necessary and Proper clauses in the Constitution, and I sketched a number of claims about the origin and meaning of these clauses, highlighting the distinction between the Foregoing Powers and All Other Powers provisions. [read post]
