Search for: "People v. Mitchell" Results 541 - 560 of 624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Recently, Froomkin gave a public address as part of his installation as the Laurie Silvers and Mitchell Rubenstein Endowed Distinguished Professorship, a rotating chair he'll hold for a three year period. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
After nearly two weeks, the plaintiff was transferred back to Avery-Mitchell. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm by Kalvis Golde
This Stat Pack would not have been possible without the help of James Romoser, Angie Gou and Mitchell Jagodinski. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am by Marty Lederman
  The Attorney General, Richard Kleindienst, also resigned that day because he had been close to some of those under DOJ investigation, including former Attorney General John Mitchell. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Mitchell McCluskey reports for CNN. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:29 am by Emma Snell
Ellen Mitchell reports for The Hill. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
How many people, including judges, were aware of his harassment? [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am by Marty Lederman
 (Mullet said that beard and hair cuttings would stop people from being “Amish hypocrites. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
 Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion in the Bostock case, while purporting to be based solely on the plain meaning of the text, actually relies on a host of other considerations, including prior case law, law professor type hypotheticals, dictionaries (which Congress may or may not have been aware of), and just under the surface but still there, an obvious (and in my view correct)  hostility to the negative consequences that would result from allowing employers to fire… [read post]