Search for: "Person v. Company"
Results 541 - 560
of 31,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
The case The Medicines Company v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:47 am
The other two companies (National Asset Advisors and National Asset Mortgage (NAM)) were “covered persons” subject to the Bureau’s jurisdiction because they serviced the contracts by collecting payments, handled consumer disputes, and spoke with consumers about the contracts’ terms. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm
On April 16, 2008, a California Appellate Court decided Bradstreet v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 6:00 am
A charter school, the Supreme Court concluded, falls within the definition of "person" under the UCL: [T]he UCL defines "persons" subject to that law to "mean and include natural persons, corporations, firms, partnerships, joint stock companies, associations and other organizations of persons. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
In Forbes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
In Forbes v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 1:48 pm
Leach in the decision of Ismail v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
Cir. 2018) (holding that, for personal jurisdiction purposes, a letter sent to a company’s counsel is directed to the company at its headquarters, not the location of counsel); Inamed Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:35 am
An employee who was wrongfully dismissed has won their motion to interview the company’s president as part of their case Nezhat-Mahal v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:35 am
An employee who was wrongfully dismissed has won their motion to interview the company’s president as part of their case Nezhat-Mahal v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 7:49 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court held oral arguments in a personal jurisdiction case involving purchasers of the drug Plavix who bought the drug in Ohio but wanted to join a suit in California where the company does almost 1 billion dollars... [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:35 am
ACE American Insurance Company. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:04 pm
Some courts, like Truckweld Equipment Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm
It is the party known as Person or Persons Unknown. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 8:14 am
Chuck Person and Rashan Michel, US v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
As regular readers of CBL know, California's Proposition 65 prohibits companies employing ten or more persons from exposing persons to "chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer" or "chemicals known to the State of California to cause reproductive or developmental harm" without first giving "clear and reasonable warning. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm
Supreme Court’s decision Rutherford Food Corp. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 11:49 am
The Personal Insurance Company of Canada. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 7:39 am
The Federal case out of the Western District of Wisconsin, styled, Allen v. [read post]
