Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 541 - 560 of 177,826
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Not only was the delay minimal, but plaintiff received inpatient and rehabilitative treatment for more than two months following the accident, and therefore had a reasonable excuse for the delay (see Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Not only was the delay minimal, but plaintiff received inpatient and rehabilitative treatment for more than two months following the accident, and therefore had a reasonable excuse for the delay (see Matter of Rijos v New York City Tr. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Apparently, they failed to address the plaintiffs claim that the accident had “exacerbated preexisting injuries to the plaintiff's right shoulder and the cervical and lumbar regions of her spine. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiffs’ claims under Judiciary Law § 487 are timely, Supreme Court correctly granted defendant’s motion. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
  However, the Chancery Court’s recent decision in In re Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The plaintiff, a stockholder of the Company, argued that these provisions violated Sections 141(a) and 141(c) of the DGCL. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:24 pm by Howard Bashman
“Judicial Notice (06.09.24): After Affirmative Action; Important opinions from Judge Kevin Newsom, the start of the Hunter Biden trial, a plaintiffs’ firm’s big payday, and the latest group hire by Paul Hastings. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- affirming district court’s district decision that the CIA properly invoked Exemption 1 to withhold a 1989 report drafted by Leonard Peroots concerning a 1983 nuclear crisis with the Soviet Union; rejecting plaintiffs argument that the CIA was precluded from withholding the memo because the State Department previously published a version of the memo with the CIA’s blessing. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:43 am by Gene Takagi
“It’s different for all of us, and that’s a strength. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:39 am by Andrew Delaney
Eventually, with plaintiff's participation and going over some heads, the project went through and the State got the savings. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:48 am by David Adelstein
Contrary to the District’s argument, the setoff statute applies where a plaintiff releases “any person” — the statute is not limited to only litigants. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:40 pm by Allan Blutstein
Marshals Service properly relied on Exemption 7(C) in refusing to confirm or deny the existence of certain third-party information relating to plaintiffs criminal case'; and (2) USMS performed adequate search for certain records the agency did not locate pertaining to plaintiffs criminal case. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 12:29 pm by Arfaa Law Group
They contended that even if their standard of care was breached, it did not cause the plaintiffs permanent injuries. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
In 2020, the plaintiff learned that “Defendant was using Plaintiffs Marks in online tamale advertisements and in Google AdWords, which placed Defendant’s products above Plaintiffs products in search results for the phrase ‘Texas Tamale.'” That prompted this litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 4:03 am by Mavrick Law Firm
The plaintiffs evidentiary proffer is “merely a representation of what evidence the defendant proposes to present and is not actual evidence. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:07 pm by Sandy T. Fox
The trial court ruled in favor of the defendant, determining that the MSA’s purpose was to divide the couple’s assets and liabilities without expressing a clear intent to benefit the plaintiff or her mother. [read post]