Search for: "Powell v. Powell" Results 541 - 560 of 2,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Policy Project blog has piece by Holly Powell-Jones entitled Online abuse: teenagers might not report it because they often don’t see it as a problem The TGI de Paris ruled on 9 A;pril 2019 that Facebook’s T&Cs on user-generated copyright content were unclear and confusing and were were unfair under the consumer code. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
But he took comfort in Judge Gilstrap's decision in PanOptis v Huawei and felt that this would not happen more widely. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
At the very end of last week’s oral argument in Flowers v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Powell, Jr.Anders Walker shows how a generation of scholars and judges has misinterpreted Powell’s definition of diversity in the landmark case Regents v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Justice Powell was the controlling vote, and that's how the partial incorporation result was reached. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:02 pm by Steve Lubet
The convictions were reversed the following year in Powell v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 8:01 am by Dave
In Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 29 and Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 24 (QB), the question of the effect of the public sector equality duty under s. 149, Equality Act 2010, on possession proceedings where there had been drugs problems at the property was in issue. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]