Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 541 - 560 of 5,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 6:26 am
Contents include:Andreas Raffeiner, Die doppelte Staatsbürgerschaft in den 28 Mitgliedsstaaten der Europäischen Union Thomas Faist, Local and Transnational Citizenship Gilbert Gornig, Doppelte Staatsangehörigkeit und Völkerrecht Oskar Peterlini, Ein Pass für Nachfahren österreichischer Staatsbürger Monica Rosini, Dual Citizenship of German and Ladin Minority Groups of South Tyrol Rainer J. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Scholars like Bruce Ackerman, John Harrison, Akhil Amar, and most recently Thomas Colby have proposed a wide variety of conflicting ways to handle these problems. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Thomas' brief, seven-page majority's opinion just reinforces the strict definition of the "clearly established" requirement that has been around since Justice O'Connor's opinion in Williams v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am by Rosalind English
(Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (2009) The search powers of security personnel at airports were qualitatively different, said the Court. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:33 am by Kali Borkoski
At ACSblog, John Hollway has a detailed analysis of Connick v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:30 pm
Justice Thomas dissented, Justice Scalia joined in part on Justice Thomas’ dissenting opinion. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:44 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
The New York Times discusses the separation-of-powers issues involved in Kiyemba v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm by Ilya Shapiro - Guest
  (The panel also rejected the taxing power argument – a darling of academia but so far gaining exactly zero votes in the judiciary.) [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
This post cannot analyze all those cases in detail but here is one representative example (there are many more).In Seila Law v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
I also reject George and Craddock's broad view of Section 5 of the 14th Amendment -- a view of Congress's power rejected by the Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. [read post]