Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue"
Results 541 - 560
of 843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2013, 6:11 am
Marie Tribe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:07 pm
The United States Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (the “Agencies”) yesterday announced that same-sex couples who were legally married in jurisdictions that recognize same-sex marriages (i.e., either in states within the United States, United States territories or in other countries) will be treated as married for federal tax purposes. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) today ruled that legally married same-sex couples will be treated as married for federal tax purposes. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:03 pm
From the Washington Post: The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service announced on Thursday that they would treat legal same-sex marriages the same as heterosexual marriages for federal tax purposes. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:03 am
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:03 am
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
If so, hopefully those prior violations are documented. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:26 am
The current (still in effect) guidelines worksheet remains at the Massachusetts Department of Revenue's website and should be replaced with the newly revised worksheet when the new guidelines go into effect on August 1.Following is a summary of the key revisions, as provided in the trial court's press release:Summary of Key Changes to the Existing GuidelinesThe 2012 Child Support Guidelines Task Force recommended a number of clarifications and changes. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:07 am
Tech business news these days is dominated by headlines about the trial of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 7:50 am
The well-known warning about silence that originated in Miranda v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 2:09 pm
Critics of the ITC have warned all along that this trade agency with quasijudicial powers is not going to reform itself and have urged lawmakers to require the ITC to apply a standard to import ban decisions that should be more (or fully) consistent with the eBay v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Appellate Division, First Department Child Support - Award - CSSA - Shared Custody - First Department Rejects Rule Established in Baraby That in an Equally Shared Custody Case the Parent Who Has the Greater Income Should Be Considered the Noncustodial Parent for Purposes of Support In Rubin v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:04 pm
Kansas Department of Revenue (Oklahoma, tribal jurisdiction)* News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmWe feature an article in the "Economic Development" section regarding off-reservation gaming and the Spokane Tribe. * Law Review & Bar Journal Indian Law Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/currentlr.htm We feature an article this week relating to the World Bank's International Finance Corporation and its free,… [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 5:31 am
Forms are available from the Department of Revenue (DOR) to allow homeowners to claim up to $6,000 in tax credits for septic upgrades. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:13 am
See Jackson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Michigan Department of Community Health v. [read post]
