Search for: "Research in Motion Ltd" Results 541 - 560 of 697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Nestle Waters N.A., Inc (Property, intangible) Weatherproof blows a Presidential naming and branding opportunity (Name Wire) (IPKat) (Brand Channel)   US Trade Marks – Decisions TTAB precedential no 1: Affirms 2(d) refusal of MAX & Design over MAX for overlapping insurance services: In re Max Capital Group Ltd (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 51: Denies sanctions but orders parties to hold discovery conference with board participation: Promgirl, Inc v JPC CO LTD… [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
Scientific Research Funding Group, 189 F.3d 1327, 1334 (Fed. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:37 am by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Research In Motion, Ltd. of Canada and Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 7:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Veles Ltd, No. 06cv2988, 2007 U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:15 am
Matrixx then sent a letter requesting that the researchers report their research without use of Matrixx's company name or product trademarks. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:15 am
 Matrixx then sent a letter requesting that the researchers report their research without use of Matrixx’s company name or product trademarks. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Rothschild, Prof Gertrude Neumark - More settlements in and out of court for litigious LED professor (Green Patent Blog) SP Techs - N D Illinois: Inventor not allowed to intervene in patent dispute: SP Techs v Garmin Int’l (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Warner Music – Warner Music and Sony drop XM radio suit (IPKat)   US Trademarks Joe Dreitler expounds on ‘The… [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:37 pm
The complaint alleges that Research In Motion, Ltd. of Canada and Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas (collectively, “RIM”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain authentication systems, including software and handheld electronic devices which allegedly infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
not sufficiently distinctive to qualify for trade mark protection (Class 46)   Guernsey Guernsey: the offshore jurisdiction of choice for IP rights (IP Frontline)   India The power to suspend operation of a patent: IPAB’s stay of operation of Ramkumar’s patent covering dual SIM phones (Spicy IP) USPTO to use Indian traditional knowledge database (Managing Intellectual Property) (Spicy IP) (Securing Innovation) Madras High Court records issues in Bajaj-TVS patent dispute (Spicy… [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 8:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thus, Freestar's motion to exclude was granted. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
 Respondents CompX International, Inc. and Waterloo Furniture Corporation Ltd. d/b/a CompX Waterloo (collectively, “CompX”) filed an opposition to the motion on October 14, 2009. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
 Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP (collectively, “Samsung”), Research In Motion, Ltd. and Research In Motion Corp. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (5 percent), ValueAct Capital (10 percent), Capital Research and Management Company (10 percent), Vanguard Group, Inc. (10 percent), Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P (unspecified), Barclays Global Investors (5-15 percent). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
It’s all good – discussion of World Trademark Review article ‘Research reveals increased US confidence in China’s rights enforcement regime’ (China Law Blog) Administrative patent proceedings within the Chinese government (Maier & Maier) Chinese counterfeit integrated circuits sold to US Navy. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]