Search for: "STATE v. LOW" Results 541 - 560 of 10,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm by Ronald Mann
” Offering yet another perspective, Justice Neil Gorsuch pointed to an earlier case (Gobeille v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 8:28 am by Steven Cohen
Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Ohio – September 12th, 2019) involves a slip and fall at a Lowe’s store located in South Lebanon, Ohio. [read post]
Amidst historically low oil prices and economic shutdowns, fossil fuel companies continue to defend against lawsuits brought by state and local governments claiming climate-change related damages. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 9:29 pm
United States and Matters of Evidence Before the International Court of Justice Fernando Lusa Bordin, The Nicaragua v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 2:14 pm by Native American Rights Fund
California (Tribal-State Gaming Compact - Misrepresentation)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlSan Pasqual Band of Mission Indians v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
Heffernan v Rent Service [2009] EWHC 3539 (Admin) Mr Heffernan has renewed his battle with Sheffield's rent officers with a new appearance before the High Court. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by David Smith
Heffernan v Rent Service [2009] EWHC 3539 (Admin) Mr Heffernan has renewed his battle with Sheffield's rent officers with a new appearance before the High Court. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm by Gabriel Scheffler
For instance, in tweeting out an announcement of its proposed replacement for the Clean Power Plan vacated in West Virginia v. [read post]