Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 541 - 560
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc. holding that the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (“APJs”) under the AIA violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
The generic drug manufacturer? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
SMITH and DIEBOLD INCORPORATED, Petitioners, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:03 pm
Smith, 57 F.2d 227, 237-39) (E.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 10:17 am
Smith and Grant R. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
The development of new AI programs has made it easier to quickly generate lifelike audio. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
LANE, Appellees. 1st District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Foreign corporations -- Service of process on defendant corporation quashed -- Plaintiff attempted to perform substitute service pursuant to incorrect Florida long arm jurisdiction statute -- Further, plaintiff did not strictly comply with requirements for substituted service against domestic corporation, which requires notification by registered or certified mail to defendant after… [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Smith, if the law is neutral and generally applicable, it is subjected to rationality review. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The test in Smith v Jones is discretionary. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Marshals Service employees. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Smith Corp., 990 A.2d 801 (Pa. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
IPSO has posted on its approach to regulating user generated content. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
After exhausting administrative remedies, San Francisco petitioned the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
Then there was Monday’s grant in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
By Russell Smith It is getting cold out there for Occupy Wall Street (OWS). [read post]
