Search for: "Southern States Holding, Inc."
Results 541 - 560
of 1,777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
Defendants included: American Electric Power Company, Inc., American Electric Power Service Corporation, Southern Company, Tennessee Valley Authority, Xcel Energy, Inc., and Cinergy Corporation. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 6:36 pm
" E-Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:19 am
Southern California Edison Co., 227 F.3d 1361 (Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
However, a decade later, the Court would retreat from that holding and remove the presumption. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:45 am
CrouchCambridge Environmental, Inc. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:46 am
Crouch Cambridge Environmental, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
Ctr., Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:12 am
A U.S. judge in California has allowed a class action lawsuit to proceed against satellite-radio company Sirius XM Holdings Inc over the payment of royalties for pre-1972 tracks. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:00 am
Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:00 pm
On June 7, 2022, the court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law, holding, in relevant part, that (1) Marfield and Shanara are in default under the loan agreements; and (2) the Lenders’ preferred ship mortgages related to said default outrank Grupo R’s state-created liens arising from Grupo R’s attachment of the MAYA and MARANGO under Texas state law. [read post]
6 May 2017, 10:11 am
(“Braintree”) appealsfrom the Southern District of New York’s summary judgmentthat Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:34 am
Consequence Holdings, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:45 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
I like opinions in trademark infringement cases that don’t just gloss over LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION issues, but I have to admit I wasn’t ready for what awaited me when, after seeing the tweet reproduced below from Bill Donahue, I undertook to dig into yesterday’s ruling by the Southern District of New York in Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 10:09 am
, in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for fraud. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:17 pm
The narrow interpretation of the CFAA holds that the term `without authorization’ only reaches conduct by outsiders who did not have permission to access the plaintiff's computer. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:04 pm
Fla.), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that “[t]he common factor in all of the trade secret privilege cases is that the parties opposing production have asserted the privilege because they claim that the trade secrets re not at issue in their cases. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:58 am
Pacific Oilseeds, Inc., 592 F.2d 409, 421 (8th Cir. 1979)). [read post]
