Search for: "Spencer, in Matter of"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 Four issues, answered as follows: (1) Police obtaining subscriber information matching the IP address from the ISP constitute a search? [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
A dozen years ago I wrote an article about regulating activity on the Internet (‘Solving Legal Issues in Electronic Government: Jurisdiction, Regulation, Governance’, (2002), 1 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology No. 3 p. 1 ) in which I suggested that a number of successful regulatory strategies focused on intermediaries, as the principal targets of regulation might be hard to find or hard to persuade. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
Spencer’s computer. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:48 am
Further, the Conservative leader in the Senate claims Spencer has “no impact whatsoever” on Bill S-4. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:57 pm
Spencer upholding the right to privacy on the Internet. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The Court agreed with Spencer. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
The Court agreed with Spencer. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
In this case, the subject matter of the search was not simply a name and [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
In this decision (which has been labelled by many a ‘results based decision’), it clearly did not matter to the CJEU that the original licence was non-transferable. [read post]
28 May 2014, 2:48 pm
She also is recognized for her publications, industry leadership, workshops and presentations on these and other human resources concerns and regularly speaks and conducts training on these matters.Her insights on these and other matters appear in the Bureau of National Affairs, Spencer Publications, the Wall Street Journal, the Dallas Business Journal, the Houston Business Journal, and many other national and local publications. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Notably, Geller and Spencer have very publicly opposed the construction of a mosque near Ground Zero. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:48 am
The Board found the mark contains“matter which may disparage” a group of persons inviolation of § 2(a) of the Trademark Act. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:16 pm
Others rarely come into play, including a registration bar for any mark containing “matter which may disparage. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:10 pm
The case is today’s In re Geller & Spencer (Fed. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:55 pm
The appeals court agreed with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's conclusion that the phrase contains matter which may disparage a group of persons. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
Publishers of her many highly regarded writings on health industry and human resources matters include the Bureau of National Affairs, Aspen Publishers, ABA, AHLA, Aspen Publishers, Schneider Publications, Spencer Publications, World At Work, SHRM, HCCA, State Bar of Texas, Business Insurance, James Publishing and many others. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:18 pm
Publishers of her many highly regarded writings on health industry and human resources matters include the Bureau of National Affairs, Aspen Publishers, ABA, AHLA, Aspen Publishers, Schneider Publications, Spencer Publications, World At Work, SHRM, HCCA, State Bar of Texas, Business Insurance, James Publishing and many others. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 7:40 am
A recent case emanating from Kings County Surrogate’s Court, Matter of Kramer, N.Y.L.J. [read post]
