Search for: "State v Sullivan"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:27 am
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entitled Haitayan, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., case no. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
In Matter of Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:30 am
During the past four terms, the Roberts Court has heard about 10 cases from the state courts per term, reversing on average 84% of the cases it has reviewed.Last term on direct review, the Supreme Court decided just eight cases from the state courts (plus one case, Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:44 am
--Dwight Sullivan [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:16 am
In Salyer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:31 am
In Manpower, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
(stating that Court will not adopt Sullivan standard in Canada). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
Sullivan, and Laurence H. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
In addition to its more major problems, NMCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:30 am
Here in the United States, Samsung is also running into IP trouble with its Galaxy tab. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:33 am
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled in a 6-0 judge opinion in Heeran v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 10:11 am
Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272, 1283 (Fed. [read post]
18 May 2019, 11:12 am
What does Sullivan have to say? [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In addition, on December 21, 2022, the New York DFS proposed guidance for New York state-regulated banking and mortgage institutions relating to management of material financial risks from climate change. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:09 pm
A case from the Third Department - Matter of Humane Socy. of United States v Fanslau, 2008 NY Slip Op 0668, indicates yes - partially. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:01 am
In 1963, the Court held in Bantam Books v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Sullivan v. [read post]