Search for: "State v. Angle"
Results 541 - 560
of 941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:00 pm
The first installment of The Weekly Posner comes from a recent Seventh Circuit opinion called ATA Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm
This case offers several lessons for reducing exposure: a court is likely to assess (i) whether decision makers took a truly careful and thoughtful review of the evidence; (ii) whether independent decision makers were introduced to take a fresh look at the evidence; (iii) whether the problem employee was asked for his or her side of the story before finalizing the termination; (iv) whether a cat’s paw angle was meaningfully analyzed and ruled out; and (v) whether there are… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm
This case offers several lessons for reducing exposure: a court is likely to assess (i) whether decision makers took a truly careful and thoughtful review of the evidence; (ii) whether independent decision makers were introduced to take a fresh look at the evidence; (iii) whether the problem employee was asked for his or her side of the story before finalizing the termination; (iv) whether a cat’s paw angle was meaningfully analyzed and ruled out; and (v) whether there are… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
The Court of Appeal in Arechiga v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:05 am
This legal term is largely defined by the Worcester Firefighter's case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 6:05 pm
Such was the case in People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 6:36 am
The style of the case is, Monk v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
V. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
Maheera and Urantia Foundation v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
J-B Weld Company, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 7:32 am
To his right (from the beholder's angle), his deputy, Judge Dr. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
E.G. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:15 pm
Where the cause of action in the two proceedings is different, issue estoppel operates to prevent re-litigation of any issue determined in the prior proceeding. [20] The pre-conditions to making out issue estoppel are stated in Angle v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
It must be for the applicant to state clearly the type of monopoly for which he contends. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:19 am
Daimler brought its EU antitrust complaint against Nokia in 2018, and the Euporean Commission is still dragging its feet while another court decision (Nokia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:49 am
In Wolfskin v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which are… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am
In Vigil v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Dryer v. [read post]
