Search for: "State v. Brooks" Results 541 - 560 of 2,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
She stated, "we're letting people in Ontario, Canada define marriage for people who live in New York State. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday (Day 76), the defence case of Rebekah Brooks’ former PA, Cheryl Carter, began. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:57 am by Matt Bouchard
”  As the Lienguard decision makes clear, “legal documents” are defined as “documents or contracts by which legal rights are secured,” citing State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am by IAN SKELT
It has been stressed that the question of whether the harm from a third party resulted from a positive act or from an omission by the police should not justify a different outcome and that the distinction was unmeritorious: Brooks v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2005] 1 WLR 1495 at [32] and repeated in Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2015] 1 AC 1732 at [51]. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
  Yesterday also marked the end of the road for the First Amendment claims of former Virginia Department of Corrections officers in Brooks v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
To justify the removal of Taney’s bust, the bill declares that: While sitting in the United States Capitol, the Supreme Court issued the infamous Dred Scott v Sanford decision on March 6, 1857. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If the state sues in civil court, though, the legal actions are titled things like "State of Texas v. [read post]