Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 9,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
(Ehrlich v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:24 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:11 pm
ShareMonday’s argument in Siegel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Neal’s Lessee), that whether state law comes from statutes or judicial rulings is no concern of the federal government (Erie), and that states have broad power under the Tenth Amendment (subject, of course, to republican government principles) to blend legislative and judicial roles (Calder v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:49 pm
The Court granted leave to appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission Division of the First District in Illinois State Treasurer v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court’s May 22, 2017 ruling in TC Heartland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:54 am
In People of the State of California, et al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am
In a published opinion filed June 30, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal applied well-established CEQA statute of limitations rules, and a “persuasive dictum” from one of its prior decisions addressing the requirements for valid tolling agreements, to affirm a judgment dismissing a CEQA claim as time-barred. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
Sure the District Court's explanation is incoherent, but the First says it wasn't an abuse of discretion. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:52 am
The law makes wide ranging changes to the state’s criminal law and procedure, including adjustments to satellite-based monitoring based on Grady v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:51 pm
(citing Mota v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
In a published opinion filed June 9, 2023, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) reversed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate in consolidated CEQA actions and upheld the adequacy of the UC Regents’ EIR for vegetation removal actions planned to occur within about 800 acres of hilly, forested and fire-prone land on UC Berkeley’s Hill Campus. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am
The other side first argued, after Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
Moreover, I note that "United States district court decisions are not controlling authority in this Court. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 10:59 am
Because Texas’ Second District Court of Appeals misapplied the Supreme Court of Texas’ holding in Perry Homes v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:47 am
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. [read post]
