Search for: "State v. J. D. C."
Results 541 - 560
of 3,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
In this case, Allen J. held: [29] Foreign states generally enjoy immunity from law suits in Canada under the State Immunity Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
The District Court (Rakoff, J.) [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
To the nearest mm (or degree), the claimants’ dimensions are A = 35mm, B = 95mm, C = 52 mm, D = 104 mm and ? [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
§ 2703(d), 2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
C 07-5017 RJB, 2008 WL 222627, at *1-2 (W.D.Wash. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:06 am
C&J Coupe Family Ltd. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
Dorsett D. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
C. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
As a result, "[d]uring the stay imposed by CPLR 321 (c), no proceedings against the party will have any adverse effect. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
As a result, "[d]uring the stay imposed by CPLR 321 (c), no proceedings against the party will have any adverse effect. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
After the tables, we document notable individual income tax changes implemented in 2022. 2022 State Income Tax Rates and Brackets State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, as of January 1, 2022 Single Filer Married Filing Jointly Standard Deduction Personal Exemption State Rates Brackets Rates Brackets Single Couple Single Couple Dependent Alabama 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,500 $7,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,000 (a, b, c) 4.00% > $500… [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Lanier, William J. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:23 pm
Thomson, Jr. and Judge Carmen D. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 8:16 am
Luamba c. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
On 23 February 2017, there was an application in Candy v Holyoake before Warby J. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
"In their pre-answer motion to dismiss, defendants Michael J. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Database updated July 2009Raymond J. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
at 716 (Hall, J., concurring specially). [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In particular he stated that 'there was no suggestion from either party that the Shanks patents were crucial to Unilever’s success. [read post]
