Search for: "State v. James E. Grant"
Results 541 - 560
of 916
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 7:38 am
Per Goonan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Succinctly stated, “Termination may be exercised at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever is earlier. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Succinctly stated, “Termination may be exercised at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever is earlier. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Succinctly stated, “Termination may be exercised at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever is earlier. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Succinctly stated, “Termination may be exercised at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever is earlier. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
Succinctly stated, “Termination may be exercised at any time during a period of five years beginning at the end of thirty-five years from the date of publication of the work under the grant or at the end of forty years from the date of execution of the grant, whichever is earlier. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am
: Who Owns an E-mail Message? [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm
[i] See, e.g., James L. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
After CareFlite terminated her employment, Janis E. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 1:19 pm
Supreme Court, which has granted review of Gunn v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
For reasons stated below, Google’s request is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 1. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
submit=rss_sho&shofile=11-1256_001.pdf … B-SDNY:Great end chart summarizes surviving Lehman alleg. v JPM w/both sides' positions & Ct rationale for no dismissal http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY: Cplt that JPM put “fin. gun to LBHI's head" etc by threatening to stop clearing services states valid claims… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
EPA's granted waivers for the use of E15. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
FIX v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
District Judge James D. [read post]
