Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 541 - 560
of 912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 10:17 am
“Does it matter that most innovative activity, at least in the United States, is taking place in a small number of venture capital funded locations? [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:50 am
See Vas-Cath Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 7:34 am
See Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:50 am
Could the Court have been influenced by Congress' enactment of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, reversing the Court's 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
Take her opening in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
The court agreed stating: While the Supreme Court has characterized infringement as defined in the Hatch-Waxman Act as "highly artificial," see Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
Ledbetter v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 10:33 pm
The Texas Supreme Court reversed, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Jolly v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
" (quoting Lilly v Novopharm / Olanzapine) Starting around 2005, until the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca, Canadian courts applied the Promise Doctrine in the pharmaceutical context to invalidate patents. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 503 F. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
First up is Wittman v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., avoiding the Christopher v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:41 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
In many circumstances, she had to make a decision because the law required it but it was not necessarily the best thing for the family.Inevitably there was some discussion about the implications of Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Summary of… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
In Lillie & Reed v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600, following a 6 month trial, he found two nursery workers, Dawn Reed and Christopher Lillie had been libelled in a Report commissioned by the Council which accused them of wide-scale sexual abuse of pre-school children. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:18 am
Id. at **6-7 (quoting Lilly v. [read post]
