Search for: "State v. Lucas"
Results 541 - 560
of 695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
The subject matter simply does not lend itself to broad rules: the most recent attempt to make it more rule-based was Justice Scalia’s opnion in Lucas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
Devenney On March 22, 2012, the Indiana Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision relating to Project safety in the Hunt Construction Group v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
In Sentient Jet LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:24 am
Such claims for compensation are fostered by the 1992 decision, Lucas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
Devenney On March 22, 2012, the Indiana Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision relating to Project safety in the Hunt Construction Group v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm
Lucas A. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 6:25 am
“ Kubisz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
In the case of R v Markham and Edwards ([2017] EWCA Crim 739) the Court of Appeal upheld the order of Haddon-Cave J permitting the press to name Kim Edwards and Lucas Markham, 15 year olds, who were convicted of the murder of Ms Edwards’ mother and sister. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
Even the Lucas direction is distilled : People can tell lies about some things and still tell the truth about other things. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
He did, however, strike out the defendant’s Lucas-Box meanings on the ground that “advancing Lucas-Box meanings that are at variance with the actual meaning found by the Court is wrong in principle”. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court concluded that the State was entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Lucas. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
